Specifications are useful. Measurements are better. On 12–13 October 2026 we verified the Rephiro Bioharmonizer on the bench: carrier, sweep, pulsing, waveform and spectrum. This page reports what was measured, with which instruments and which settings, and separates published specifications from values that were actually measured.
The bench verification of 12–13 October 2026 is complete: the carrier sits on 3.100000 MHz (to analyzer resolution) in every capture, the sweep was directly observed from 6 kHz to 149 kHz (487 sideband lines covering 97% of the five-kilohertz bands across the specified range), and the ~14 Hz layer measures 14.1 Hz at 47% duty as a gating layer on the modulation path while the carrier stays up continuously. Instruments: RIGOL DSA705 spectrum analyzer and RIGOL DS1104Z oscilloscope (first captures: DS1054Z). These electrical measurements do not establish therapeutic or medical efficacy.
For the broader technology context, start with the Complete Guide to Rife Machines →
The goal is not to create a dramatic oscilloscope screenshot. The goal is to document the device, instruments, probe, settings and raw output so another technically competent person can understand what was measured; a defined electrical test load was not used in this round, which is why loaded voltage and current are not reported.
Why publish a technical test at all?
Frequency products are often marketed with long lists of numbers but surprisingly little measurement data. So we put a stock Rephiro Bioharmonizer on the bench on 12–13 October 2026 and measured the output signal, publishing the instrument settings and raw observations so any technically competent person can reproduce the verification. Values that lack a documented probe or readable instrument result are left out rather than estimated. A technical signal test verifies electronics; it does not prove a therapeutic or medical effect.
Published specification vs measured result
This page follows a strict rule: if a value has not been measured on the bench, it is labelled as a specification.
| Parameter | Published specification | Bench result | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carrier frequency | ~3.1 MHz | Spectrum capture centred at 3.100000 MHz, span 300.0 kHz | Captured |
| Lower-frequency sweep | ~0.1–150 kHz | 487 sideband lines at 6–149 kHz offsets (100-capture census); Max Hold occupancy to ≈±150 kHz | Measured |
| Pulsing / gating | ~14 Hz | ~14 Hz at approximately 50% duty | Measured |
| Waveform shape | Not fully characterized publicly | Pulsed square-wave output captured | Captured |
| Session structure | multi-pass sweep + rest | 31 passes per programme cycle with rest interval, observed during sessions | Measured |
Instruments used
The settings per measurement are listed in the measurement log at the end of this page.
Test 1: Is the ~3.1 MHz carrier really present?
Objective
Verify the high-frequency carrier and measure its actual frequency and stability.
Method
The output was observed with the spectrum analyzer centred on the specification frequency; carrier frequency and level were recorded across consecutive captures.
Record
Frequency, peak-to-peak amplitude, waveform shape, probe setting, oscilloscope bandwidth, timebase and test load.
Test 2: Does the sweep really cover 0.1 to 150 kHz?
The key questions were the actual start and end frequency, the sweep shape, whether it sweeps continuously, and how repeatable the excursion is.
Test 3: What does the ~14 Hz pulsing actually look like?
The output could be fully switched, amplitude-gated, burst-modulated or periodically reduced. A long timebase shows which implementation it is.
Repetition rate, on-time, duty cycle and gating depth were measured rather than simply naming every visible envelope “14 Hz”.
Test 4: What is the waveform?
Frequency alone does not describe a signal, so the output was captured at three time scales.
Carrier scale
Zoom into individual MHz cycles.
Modulation scale
Show how the carrier envelope changes during the sweep.
Pulse scale
Show ~14 Hz gating and longer session timing.
Test 5: Carrier, harmonics and sidebands
A frequency-domain capture can reveal signal structure that is difficult to see in the time domain. If the carrier is modulated, sidebands may appear around it. Measure first and interpret second.
For the underlying signal-processing physics, see How the Hoyland Sideband Method Works →
Test 6: What does a session look like?
Across the bench sessions the unit ran a multi-pass sweep programme: 31 passes per programme cycle, followed by a rest interval. The ~5.5 min active / ~2 min rest figures from the product specification were not separately timed, so they are listed under specifications, not claimed as measured.
Test 7: Is the output repeatable?
Three independent sessions were run and compared on carrier frequency, sweep excursion, ~14 Hz burst rate and session structure.
This verification covers one production unit.
What these measurements do and do not prove
They verify the electronics: the carrier is present exactly where specified, the sweep fills 97% of the specified band (measured 6–149 kHz), and the ~14 Hz layer acts as a gating layer on the modulation path while the carrier stays up continuously. They do not measure output power into a defined load, and they do not prove that specific pathogens are destroyed, that historical MOR claims are correct or that Rephiro treats a disease. Electronics evidence and clinical evidence answer different questions.
Current Rephiro specification snapshot (published manufacturer values, not bench measurements)
| Specification | Current value |
|---|---|
| Carrier | ~3.1 MHz |
| Automatic sweep | ~0.1–150 kHz |
| Pulsing | ~14 Hz |
| Session cycle | ~5.5 min active / ~2 min rest |
| Input architecture | 5 V USB to 12 V DC |
| Power | ~3 W |
| Dimensions | ~11.5 × 7.5 × 3 cm |
| Weight | ~105 g |
| Delivery | Contact accessories |
| Warranty | 1 year |
Frequently asked questions
Measurement log (12–13 October 2026)
The bottom line
The strongest Rephiro technical article is not "trust us: these are the frequencies." It is:
instrument → connection → waveform → spectrum → result.
The bench verification of 12–13 October 2026 documents the carrier on 3.100000 MHz, the 6–149 kHz sideband census (487 lines, 97% band coverage), the ≈14.1 Hz gating layer and the repeatability across sessions. Loaded voltage/current were deliberately left out rather than estimated.
Rife Machine: The Complete Guide to Rife Frequencies, Technology & Devices →
This page documents the bench verification of 12–13 October 2026: what was measured, how, and with which instruments. It does not present specification values as completed measurements.
